Justin  (8/25/2009 3:17:53 PM)

Agree with much of what I've read so far - namely that one (albeit long) set just leaves you wanting more.

However - I can't complain about seeing them three times in a week in the northeast - a place that is often low energy and turnout for them - of course - they could also stop touring altogether one day.

Let's love and take what we can get-

   billm622  (8/25/2009 12:23:59 PM)

The Allman's are nice, but it's Panic that brings me out to the show. Has been for years. As good as they've been this tour so far, Id feel shortchanged if I'd gotten tickets for one of these shows and dragged my ass out to see them. Seems like the best 30-45 minutes has been left out compared to previous tours.

   p9paul9p  (8/25/2009 11:30:15 AM)

I was wondering if anyone knows how they are deciding whether Panic or the Allmans open and close. Or is it set that Panic is opening everynight? Certainly hoping Panic closes at some point

   MetsFanVt  (8/24/2009 10:12:37 PM)

Good show, good energy from the band. Most of the people there didn't know what a Widespread Panic was but seemed to get into it ok. They played for about 2 hours, but this being the first time in 2 years I'd seen them, I was left wanting much more. The double headline tour is just not doin it for me